Sunday, 13 July 2014

Coaching and Mentoring - a view from the middle (draft 1)

Coaches and mentors have the potential to contribute significantly to improved learning and teaching, and so would be a useful tool to contribute to our wider professional development.

Coaching and mentoring (C&M) is about encouraging and promoting professional development based on existing capacities.  It taps into the skills already present in the organisation, and provides mechanisms for sharing good practice. These skills teaching skills are not C&M. To "tap" these skills we will need to be consciously develop the C&M capacities before the skilled practictioners can assume these roles. The impact of a new programme will take time.

By using C&M more explicitly SGS may be able to progress more rapidly in relation to our existing capacities. This would be be constrained only by the willingness and ability of colleagues to share their skills, and our leadership to identify what specific skills we need to put time into developing. 


Also we need to find the necessary time (and money) to achieve it - without the necessary resources implementation will be less effective.

We need to be clear about what we want coaching and mentoring to achieve, and the model/s we want to adopt. Successful models of coaching and mentoring for and by teachers, would enhance collegiality, and could encourage discussions of teaching and learning practice.



It is important to recognise the range of forms of mentoring and coaching whether informal, expert, or collaborative; and self-directed learning in the form of critical reflective enquiry. Coaching and mentoring is not about making judgements, creating dependency, imposing others’ agendas and initiatives, nor confirming habit, routine or long-held prejudices. However, notes on aims and progress towards these are important.

To be most effective, there will be a need for initiatives to support classroom teachers to build their coaching and mentoring capacities - there are benefits both to coach and coachee, mentor and mentee. Mentors are used widely in other fields right into senior management, which could be considered as part of capacity development in SLT.

C&M needs to be used carefully and systematically, to give the process credibility. Additional time may need to be allocated for the purpose, rather than assuming we can do it in our existing time.

The value SLT put on this project will be seen in part, by the time they allocate to develop the system, and then to put it into practice, including evaluating it, and measures you take to make it work. Your strategic view would help us to identify what you want the Coaching and Mentoring programme to achieve,

For SGS to focus on C&M to do the following could work:

  • To develop a structured professional dialogue
  • Set personal and professional goals based on self-evaluation and self-direction
  • Developing trust and a tolerance of different approaches to teaching
  • Improving collaboration with colleagues
  • Experimentation and observing
Potential barriers:
  • If existing capacities are insufficient in target areas
  • If there is lack of management support or direction
  • If there are poor levels of existing collegiality, (a prerequisite for C&M)
  • If there is a lack of time and resources;
  • If the order of priorities is unclear
Conclusions

Coaching, mentoring and collaboration could be powerful tools in professional development. Howeve, C&M is not a panacea but part of a wider solution to raising the quality of teachin, and so enhance the sharing of capacities within a school. 

Potential benefits of coaching and mentoring to:

  • Promote school and departmental improvement.
  • Promote individual and collaborative professional development
  • Promote critical reflection and self-evaluation.
  • Promote professional dialogue.
  • Increase professional confidence.
  • Build leadership capacities across the school
  • Improve the quality of learning and teaching
  • Improve pupil motivation and learning. 

Sunday, 12 December 2010

Vertical Form Tutoring

I found this blog when I was researching this topic: http://www.verticaltutoring.org/

Whilst having no principled objections to going vertical, I am a currently a skeptic. I need to understand the benefits to teaching and learning.

I suppose I don't mind whether we are vertical or horizontal, I am most worried about the transitional period.  Tutors, as always, will make the system work to the best of their ability and inclination.

I am concerned that, without significantly more form-time, few benefits to going will emerge.  The most impressive potential benefit that we are likely to be able to gain is mentoring. For this to work we will, as pastoral leaders, need training and we will need to train our teams.

One suggestion to come out of the HW SV process was that we try to get a form fully vertical, asap. I think this is a great idea.  I know a few colleagues who would volunteer! (Kind of!)
If I assess the situation correctly, the benefits accruing, relate to sharing the students' "journey".  If we go forward on this journey in partnership with both students and parents we have a greater chance to achieve change and progress in our students' learning.

Has anyone any other literature that provides a rationale for the VS? 

How could we use the pupil premium?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-11977844

With my red hat, I'd like to run, or see running, homework clubs, focusing on study skills, these could use the facilities we have at SGS more intensively.  Even allocating the funds for 3-4 students would be sufficient if we allowed the same adaptability to the school day that colleagues put in for diploma.  Also, why not let staff start later if they finish later?

Many of us would appreciate the opportunity for different hours to fit more flexibly around the obligations for care we have, whether that's our kids, or other family members.

Study skills, according to John Hattie, could boost grades by a grade and a half at GCSE (in the most disaffected students) - that's more than self assessment and peer assessment, with one grade each.

What would it need?  (White hat!)
  • Well, we need to collate subject specific study skills, and share these more explicitly with the students and whomsoever is delivering study skills. 
  • We then need tofocus the students on the study skills that are shown to work with the weakest students - that's graphic organisers.
  • We need to encourage relationships with parents of disaffected students, this could be through the PTA and then through the VFT, or learning supporter.
If I put my black hat on for a moment, I would have to doubt that the Tories are going to come up with the money, but still, if they did.....

Does this suggestion, have to imply increased funding?  Currently I could start an hour later on two days a cycle - my timetable permits this, other factors may prevent it but that's about how willingly such a situation could be tried!